| Massachusetts Striped Bass Association Since 1950 |
Natural Wheels - Off-Road Enthusiast and Environmentalist: Don't Judge Me by the Size of My Tires
By Katrina Ramser
February 4, 2008
NOVATO, Calif. - Living in Northern California, I get to enjoy all that nature has to offer: abalone diving off the Mendocino
coast, backpacking into Lassen Volcanic National Park - and trailing down Tahoe's Fordyce trail in a jacked-up, modified
1985 Toyota pickup.
You heard me. Off-road vehicles complete my love for the outdoors. You had me at 37-inch BFGoodrich Krawlers.
It wasn't always this way. Like many Americans do today, I used to believe that off-road vehicles and their drivers were the
main destroyer of the land we love and share. Today, I see that recreational four-wheeling can be compatible with
environmental sensitivity.
I am a devoted recycler and built my own compost pit in the suburbs. My organization of choice is the Blue Ribbon
Coalition, which represents more than 500,000 motorized recreationists. It's dedicated to preserving responsible
recreational access to public lands.
So how did I become a defender of the off-road lifestyle? Fourteen years ago, armed with a major in journalism and a
minor in environmental sociology, I got my first freelance gig working for an eco-newsletter in California's Humboldt County.
I witnessed firsthand what Caterpillar vehicles did to roads created for clear-cutting redwood forests. This is what I
remember about my first experience with an off-road recreation vehicle, which came during a walk through the forest: tires
spinning, mud splattering and the heinous sound of mechanical death screams as ugly smoke filled my nostrils.
During my time of eco-terror penmanship, I saw off-road vehicles and their drivers as the enemy. But then, as any good
journalist should, I got a clearer view of the enemy's perspective: I started riding with responsible off-road drivers and clubs.
I also interviewed members of the Toyota Trail Team for a series of articles on the new Toyota FJ Cruiser. I had never
before heard professional (and often certified) drivers use such caring language to describe their reasons for traveling
nationwide to Americans' favorite national parks and most famous trails. They talked earnestly about responsibility, trail
ethics and environmental sensitivity.
I discovered there are many reasons and faces behind land destruction and closure: Bureaucratic politics. Forest fires.
Global warming. Yet the Off-road Nation has long been the chief target of blame. That's why today, instead of just
defending against criticism, more and more off-road drivers are taking a different approach: They're spearheading
solutions.
Political activism is part of this effort. The U.S. Forest Service is implementing the Off-Highway Vehicle Route Designation
Project in every national forest. This project may end up closing thousands of miles of forest roads and trails. That means
these pathways to nature would be barred for nearly everyone, including off-roaders, photographers, campers and bird
watchers.
Off-road enthusiasts are responding as never before. They're raising funds for the Blue Ribbon Coalition, which is
committed to working with the Forest Service to keep access open. And they're attending public meetings, not just
for themselves but for the bird watchers, photographers and campers, too, because when a trail is kept open, it is kept
open for all.
This approach is getting results. On Jan. 10, the Forest Service reversed a decision that would have closed more than 14
miles of motorized trails in a Northern California forest.
A home for the environmentally conscious off-road enthusiast is being built. Magazines that once turned their back on
vehicle-driven content are taking a new look. Last September, Ace Atkins was able to place an essay in Outside
magazine defending his big, bad, thirsty truck. He made a point about the growing misconception that being green begins
and ends by scooting about town in a hybrid. Instead, he suggested that we judge energy abuse with broader criteria:
home size, commute time, air travel and use of electronic gadgets.
His point aligns with my own ethic: It's all about living an overall lifestyle that coexists with nature, and there's room for us all
- even those with 37-inch Krawlers.
Katrina Ramser, a freelance writer and photographer, is a frequent contributor to Off-Road.com. This article originally
appeared in The Christian Science Monitor.
By Katrina Ramser
February 4, 2008
NOVATO, Calif. - Living in Northern California, I get to enjoy all that nature has to offer: abalone diving off the Mendocino
coast, backpacking into Lassen Volcanic National Park - and trailing down Tahoe's Fordyce trail in a jacked-up, modified
1985 Toyota pickup.
You heard me. Off-road vehicles complete my love for the outdoors. You had me at 37-inch BFGoodrich Krawlers.
It wasn't always this way. Like many Americans do today, I used to believe that off-road vehicles and their drivers were the
main destroyer of the land we love and share. Today, I see that recreational four-wheeling can be compatible with
environmental sensitivity.
I am a devoted recycler and built my own compost pit in the suburbs. My organization of choice is the Blue Ribbon
Coalition, which represents more than 500,000 motorized recreationists. It's dedicated to preserving responsible
recreational access to public lands.
So how did I become a defender of the off-road lifestyle? Fourteen years ago, armed with a major in journalism and a
minor in environmental sociology, I got my first freelance gig working for an eco-newsletter in California's Humboldt County.
I witnessed firsthand what Caterpillar vehicles did to roads created for clear-cutting redwood forests. This is what I
remember about my first experience with an off-road recreation vehicle, which came during a walk through the forest: tires
spinning, mud splattering and the heinous sound of mechanical death screams as ugly smoke filled my nostrils.
During my time of eco-terror penmanship, I saw off-road vehicles and their drivers as the enemy. But then, as any good
journalist should, I got a clearer view of the enemy's perspective: I started riding with responsible off-road drivers and clubs.
I also interviewed members of the Toyota Trail Team for a series of articles on the new Toyota FJ Cruiser. I had never
before heard professional (and often certified) drivers use such caring language to describe their reasons for traveling
nationwide to Americans' favorite national parks and most famous trails. They talked earnestly about responsibility, trail
ethics and environmental sensitivity.
I discovered there are many reasons and faces behind land destruction and closure: Bureaucratic politics. Forest fires.
Global warming. Yet the Off-road Nation has long been the chief target of blame. That's why today, instead of just
defending against criticism, more and more off-road drivers are taking a different approach: They're spearheading
solutions.
Political activism is part of this effort. The U.S. Forest Service is implementing the Off-Highway Vehicle Route Designation
Project in every national forest. This project may end up closing thousands of miles of forest roads and trails. That means
these pathways to nature would be barred for nearly everyone, including off-roaders, photographers, campers and bird
watchers.
Off-road enthusiasts are responding as never before. They're raising funds for the Blue Ribbon Coalition, which is
committed to working with the Forest Service to keep access open. And they're attending public meetings, not just
for themselves but for the bird watchers, photographers and campers, too, because when a trail is kept open, it is kept
open for all.
This approach is getting results. On Jan. 10, the Forest Service reversed a decision that would have closed more than 14
miles of motorized trails in a Northern California forest.
A home for the environmentally conscious off-road enthusiast is being built. Magazines that once turned their back on
vehicle-driven content are taking a new look. Last September, Ace Atkins was able to place an essay in Outside
magazine defending his big, bad, thirsty truck. He made a point about the growing misconception that being green begins
and ends by scooting about town in a hybrid. Instead, he suggested that we judge energy abuse with broader criteria:
home size, commute time, air travel and use of electronic gadgets.
His point aligns with my own ethic: It's all about living an overall lifestyle that coexists with nature, and there's room for us all
- even those with 37-inch Krawlers.
Katrina Ramser, a freelance writer and photographer, is a frequent contributor to Off-Road.com. This article originally
appeared in The Christian Science Monitor.